Students' Perceptions of Information Programs in Canada
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using a web-based survey, this study explored students' perceptions of their master's programs in information studies at six Canadian universities. Findings indicate that students rate most aspects of their programs positively, although few respondents give the highest ratings, indicating that there is substantial room for improvement. When asked directly, How satisfied are you with the education you have received in this program?, the mean rating was 6.6 on a 10-point scale. Among the lowest ratings on quality measures were those for exposure to the latest developments in research and technology and exposure to the most significant developments in the field. We found a decrease in satisfaction as students progress through their programs. Compared to midstream students, a smaller proportion of students in their final term had positive perceptions on almost half of the measures. Findings from the study should be beneficial to information studies educators to inform decisions with respect to curriculum planning and program development.Keywords: Information studies, master's programs, student satisfaction, graduate education, LIS education, web-based surveyIntroductionWhile program assessment initiatives in higher education often focus on student performance and learning outcomes, there is a growing interest in student-oriented measures, such as satisfaction, as a measure of program quality. This focus on student satisfaction has been driven in part by a shift towards the adoption of consumer service models in higher education, which recognize the potential salutary effects of student satisfaction on recruitment and retention (Gruber, Fus, Voss, & Glaser-Zikuda, 2010; Thomas & Galambos, 2004). However, there is also a sound pedagogical rationale, as student satisfaction has been shown to influence academic performance (Bean & Bradley, 1986; Pike, 1991). Much of this research focuses on undergraduate education, but some studies have addressed graduate education including professional programs, e.g., nursing and business. In the LIS field, a limited body of research has studied students' perceptions of their educational programs across institutions, within a single institution, and across different delivery modes; other researchers have studied alumni of LIS programs. In a time of dramatic growth in the size, complexity and diversity of offerings within graduate LIS programs it behoves researchers to study students' perceptions of their programs with the goal of identifying areas where satisfaction is high and areas that need improvements. Greater understanding of students' perceptions can also lead to more effective recruitment efforts, opportunities to improve and enrich the student experience, and increased alumni support through service, donations, and willingness to serve as positive spokespeople for our programs.This paper reports on a study that investigated students' perceptions of their master's programs in six Canadian universities. Study goals were to identify perceptions of specific program attributes and to test for effects of program stage and characteristics of the sample population. Looking forward, we also asked participants in our study to indicate the extent of their support for ten possible future directions for master's programs in information schools. The study involved the development, testing and deployment of three web-based questionnaires within multiple information studies programs in Canada. Use of these evaluation tools is now open to all interested members of the LIS educational community. They are available at http://www.diigubc.ca/projects/lfos/Instrurnents.htmLiterature ReviewAlthough we have a wealth of research on LIS education, few published studies of students' perceptions of their masters programs exist. The extant published research relevant to this study falls into two categories: (1) studies of student satisfaction in higher education generally; and (2) studies of students' and graduates' perceptions of their master's programs in LIS. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.096 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it