MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1506753482 · doi:10.1109/pimrc.2004.1370887

A practical model for transmission delay of IEEE 802.11e enhanced distributed channel access

2005· article· en· W1506753482 on OpenAlexaff
J.W. Robinson, T.S. Randhawa

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Networks and Protocols
Canadian institutionsBritish Columbia Institute of TechnologySimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkDistributed coordination functionQuality of serviceIEEE 802Channel (broadcasting)Bandwidth (computing)IEEE 802.11e-2005Transmission (telecommunications)Cumulative distribution functionIEEE 802.11Wireless lanInter-Access Point ProtocolWireless networkWirelessReal-time computingWi-FiTelecommunicationsWi-Fi arrayProbability density function

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The soon to be ratified IEEE 802.11e MAC layer QoS enhancements to the 802.11 protocol are making their way into production wireless networking equipment. As greater numbers of local area networks utilize the QoS features of 802.11e, we can expect to see aggregation of these networks into larger systems capable of addressing the needs for high bandwidth, real time services. We present a practical and accurate analytical model for the saturation transmission delay of EDCA. Our model is distinguished by its ability to provide a cumulative distribution function for transmission delay and by its treatment of the post-collision period, heretofore ignored by all other 802.11 models. We prove that our model accurately predicts the cumulative distribution of transmission delay with results from the ns-2 simulator.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Networks and ProtocolsFrench-language works237,207