MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1506767726

Changing state and the irrelevant sound effect

2007· article· en· W1506767726 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Aimée M. Surprenant, Ian Neath, Tamra J. Bireta

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian acoustics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFormantStimulus (psychology)AcousticsSpeech recognitionSine waveWhite noiseAmplitudeComputer sciencePsychologyPhysicsTelecommunicationsVowelCognitive psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The definition of changing relating to the dynamic spectral and temporal properties of the irrelevant stimuli are studied. This envelope stimulus was constructed by outlining the amplitude envelope of the base passage and then replacing the time-varying frequency information with a pure tone or white noise. The effect of backward speech and sinewave speech modeled after the base stimulus was tested. A sinewave speech stimulus was constructed by performing an LPC re-synthesis on the base stimulus replacing the noise in speech formants with sinewaves at the center frequency of the formant. It was observed that a change in amplitude by itself gives little or no information about the content of the stimulus and, therefore, does not attract much in the way of attentional resources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.816
Threshold uncertainty score0.344

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian acousticsSame topicHearing Loss and RehabilitationFrench-language works237,207