MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1506767726

Changing state and the irrelevant sound effect

2007· article· en· W1506767726 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Aimée M. Surprenant, Ian Neath, Tamra J. Bireta

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian acoustics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFormantStimulus (psychology)AcousticsSpeech recognitionSine waveWhite noiseAmplitudeComputer sciencePsychologyPhysicsTelecommunicationsVowelCognitive psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The definition of changing relating to the dynamic spectral and temporal properties of the irrelevant stimuli are studied. This envelope stimulus was constructed by outlining the amplitude envelope of the base passage and then replacing the time-varying frequency information with a pure tone or white noise. The effect of backward speech and sinewave speech modeled after the base stimulus was tested. A sinewave speech stimulus was constructed by performing an LPC re-synthesis on the base stimulus replacing the noise in speech formants with sinewaves at the center frequency of the formant. It was observed that a change in amplitude by itself gives little or no information about the content of the stimulus and, therefore, does not attract much in the way of attentional resources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian acousticsSame topicHearing Loss and RehabilitationFrench-language works237,207