MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1506824078 · doi:10.1109/tit.2015.2450721

Output Constrained Lossy Source Coding With Limited Common Randomness

2015· preprint· en· W1506824078 on OpenAlexafffund
Naci Saldı, Tamás Linder, Serdar Yüksel

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Information Theory · 2015
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Communication Security Techniques
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsRandomnessEncoderComputer scienceChannel (broadcasting)AlgorithmMathematical optimizationMathematicsTelecommunicationsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies a Shannon-theoretic version of the generalized distribution preserving quantization problem where a stationary and memoryless source is encoded subject to a distortion constraint and the additional requirement that the reproduction also be stationary and memoryless with a given distribution. The encoder and decoder are stochastic and assumed to have access to independent common randomness. Recent work has characterized the minimum achievable coding rate at a given distortion level when unlimited common randomness is available. Here, we consider the general case where the available common randomness may be rate limited. Our main result completely characterizes the set of achievable coding and common randomness rate pairs at any distortion level, thereby providing the optimal tradeoff between these two rate quantities. We also consider two variations of this problem where we investigate the effect of relaxing the strict output distribution constraint and the role of private randomness used by the decoder on the rate region. Our results have strong connections with Cuff's recent work on distributed channel synthesis. In particular, our achievability proof combines a coupling argument with the approach developed by Cuff, where instead of explicitly constructing the encoder-decoder pair, a joint distribution is constructed from which a desired encoder-decoder pair is established. We show, however, that for our problem, the separated solution of first finding an optimal channel and then synthesizing this channel results in a suboptimal rate region.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Information TheorySame topicWireless Communication Security TechniquesFrench-language works237,207