MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1506978589

The Struggle for Pay Equity on the Ground

2004· article· en· W1506978589 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Judy Haiven

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian women's studies · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEquity (law)ObligationPolitical scienceCommissionHumanitiesEthnologySociologyArtLaw
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

San aucune obligation ltgale pour les employeurs de Saskatchewan d'implanter l2quitk salariale, les employh de la Commission scokzire catholique de Saskatoon ont ktk tr2s surpris d'apprendre qu 'il en serait ainsi. Mais lepersonnelfitdivisPsur cette dkcision: les secrktaires, les aides-pro-fesseurs et les employks de bureau (presque toutes des femmes) ktaient d'accord alors que lesgardiens, les concierges (presque tous des hommes) n 2taient pas d'accord. Cet article parle d'un ressac de ce syndicat contre l2quitk salariale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.160
Threshold uncertainty score0.470

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0210.026
Scholarly communication0.0130.004
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0040.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian women's studiesSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207