MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1507042277 · doi:10.30596/jrab.v14i1.159

SUKUK, DIMENSI BARU PEMBIAYAAN PEMERINTAH UNTUK PERTUMBUHAN EKONOMI

2014· article· id· W1507042277 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bahril Datuk

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Bisnis · 2014
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIslamic Finance and Communication
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSukukBusinessPolitical scienceFinancial systemGeographyIslamIslamic finance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Industri Keuangan Syariah Global mulai mengalami evolusi sejak tahun 1970s. Diawali dengan Commercial Banking, Project Finance dan Sindications(1980s), Equity, Ijarah(1990s) dan Sukuk(2000s). Nilai emisi sukuk internasional terus meningkat dari tahun ke tahun. Total penerbitan sukuk internasional dalam berbagai mata uang sampai dengan Mei 2013 mencapai US$558.47 milyar, dengan total outstanding sebesar US$276.8 milyar. Indonesia, Malaysia, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Iran, Gambia telah menerbitkan sukuk secara regular, baik domestik maupun internasional. Negara-negara non muslim yang telah menerbitkan sukuk adalah Jerman, USA, Jepang, China, United Kingdom, Canada, Russia, Singapura, Hongkong dan Gambia. Sukuk tidak hanya diterbitkan oleh Negara, korporasi atau perusahaan juga menerbitkan sukuk. Secara domestic, perusahaan Indonesia mulai menerbitkan sukuk sejak tahun 2002. Sampai dengan tahun 2013 ada 6 perusahaan yang menerbitkan sukuk. Nilai emisi sukuk korporasi domestic masih mengalami fluktuasi dari tahun ke tahun. Total outstanding sukuk korporasi sampai bulan Mei 2013 sebesar Rp.3,42 triliun dan yang telah jatuh tempo sebesar Rp.3,19 triliun.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.118

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Riset Akuntansi dan BisnisSame topicIslamic Finance and CommunicationFrench-language works237,207