MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1507228634 · doi:10.7202/007003ar

Les trajectoires de conversion et l’identité sociale chez les jeunes dans le contexte postcolonial Ouest-africain

2003· article· fr· W1507228634 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Marie Nathalie LeBlanc

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthropologie et Sociétés · 2003
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans le contexte postcolonial africain, les jeunes contribuent activement à l’émergence de nouvelles identités sociales qui s’articulent autour de la pratique religieuse, surtout en ce qui a trait aux nouvelles pratiques du christianisme et de l’islam. Dans un grand nombre de cas, l’émergence de ces nouveaux mouvements religieux s’affirme à travers des notions de modernité et de tradition. Dans un tel contexte, l’objet de cet article est de décrire le rôle des jeunes dans la construction de l’expérience religieuse. À partir d’études de cas réalisées auprès de jeunes musulmans et de membres de nouvelles Églises indépendantes en Côte-d’Ivoire, nous examinons, dans un premier temps, les modalités selon lesquelles la religion définit les pratiques et les enjeux de la modernité. Par la suite, nous explorons dans quelle mesure la religion permet aux jeunes de se négocier un espace de légitimité sociale face aux diverses relations de pouvoir, dont la gérontocratie. La juxtaposition de ces cas permettra de mettre en relief les dynamiques qui sont propres à chaque expérience religieuse, au contexte de leur manifestation, ainsi qu’aux différentes notions de la modernité qui sont renouvelées par ces jeunes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score0.186

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0100.012
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.240
GPT teacher head0.539
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2003
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnthropologie et SociétésSame topicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, GenderFrench-language works237,207