Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Whether for bi-lateral or multi-lateral joint venturesor for public and private partnerships (PPP), control helps parties form strategicalliances and work together on a unique project while protecting their own identityand goals. Even though most researchers consider formal control such ascontracts, governance mechanisms, budgets, schedules, and other projectmanagement tools, few encompass informal or social control. This study takesinto account both types of control and aims to describe the evolution of formaland social control mechanisms in an international PPP project. An in depth casestudy of a concession project in a European airport was performed and includesall partners in this Euro-Canadian consortium. Results suggest that fromfrequent and repetitive interaction between partners emerges a social control thatprogressively takes more importance in the management of the project. This isnot to say that formal control mechanisms first put forward are forgotten butrather that they are the foundation of all inter-organizational collaboration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it