MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1507252525 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2004.1328878

An embedded wavelet image coder with parallel encoding and sequential decoding of bit-planes

2004· article· en· W1507252525 on OpenAlexaff
Yufei Yuan, Mrinal Mandal

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Data Compression Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBit planeDecoding methodsEncoderComputer scienceEncoding (memory)WaveletData compressionAlgorithmArithmetic codingBitstreamCoding (social sciences)Context-adaptive binary arithmetic codingArtificial intelligenceBit fieldMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wavelet based coders are widely used in image and video compression. Many popular embedded wavelet coders are based on a data structure known as zerotree. However, there exists a category of embedded wavelet coders that are fast and efficient even without zerotrees. These coders are based on three key concepts: (1) wavelet coefficient reordering; (2) bit-plane partition; and (3) encoding of bit-planes with efficient run-length coding. In this paper, we propose a bit-plane encoder that can be used in these non-zerotree algorithms. Instead of encoding the bit-planes sequentially, the bit-plane encoding process can be completed in one pass when multiple bit-plane encoders are used simultaneously. This bit-plane encoder is inherently suitable for parallel processing architecture. The decoding process is treated sequentially since each bit-plane stream can only be synchronized upon the correct decoding of higher bit-planes. To the best of our knowledge, this paper is the first to realize parallelization through encoding multiple bit-planes simultaneously.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Data Compression TechniquesFrench-language works237,207