MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1507260518 · doi:10.1002/9780470973370.ch12

Defected Ground Structure for Microstrip Antennas

2010· other· en· W1507260518 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAntenna Design and Analysis
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrostripMicrostrip antennaAcousticsPhysicsComputer scienceElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsEngineeringAntenna (radio)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Defected Ground Structure (DGS) is relatively a new area of research and applications associated with printed circuits and antennas. This chapter addresses the fundamentals of the DGS from its evolution and modeling to the state-of-the-art applications. The DGS geometries reported so far include simple shapes such as rectangular dumbbell, circular dumbbell, spiral, "U", "V", "H, cross, concentric rings, etc. Also different complex structures like split ring resonators, or fractals have been examined. To stop the higher harmonics at the input of the microstrip element, proper bandstop characteristics in the feeding network have been explored using different DGS configurations. The DGS has been implemented to improve or modify the radiation properties of microstrip patches. Placing the DGS in between the two microstrip patches also has some useful applications in reducing mutual coupling between them. Controlled Vocabulary Terms microstrip antennas; microstrip filters; printed circuits

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.534
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAntenna Design and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207