Bibliographic record
Abstract
Que sera La Nouvelle-Orléans, après l’épreuve de l’ouragan Katrina ? Comment l’attachement des habitants à leur cité va-t-il jouer sur sa reconstruction ? Laboratoire vivant et vivace, New Orleans offre aujourd’hui l’opportunité d’observer le rôle essentiel que prend l’identité culturelle dans l’affection des habitants pour leur ville et l’influence directe que celle-ci a sur son rétablissement. à tous les niveaux de gouvernance, l’inertie des prises de décision concrètes et de leurs financements pèse lourdement sur la capacité de la ville à se rétablir promptement. Pourtant, faisant fi de conditions de vie difficiles, les Néo-Orléanais endossent leur part de responsabilité et remettent sur pied leurs quartiers, leurs réseaux de solidarité... Ce qui fait de La Nouvelle-Orléans une ville à part… unique aux États-Unis. New Orleans du futur aura-t-elle un nouveau visage ? Qu’adviendra-t-il de son identité culturelle ?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".