Friction-Assisted Magnetic Holding of an Ingestible Capsule for Esophageal pH and Impedance Monitoring
Bibliographic record
Abstract
24-hour catheter-based ambulatory pH and impedance monitoring is an essential tool for diagnosing esophageal disorders. However, catheter-based monitoring systems are uncomfortable and interfere with normal activities of the patient. To overcome these disadvantages, different wireless monitoring systems have been proposed. However, efficient ways to position and hold wireless capsules are lacking. Currently there is a need to develop safe and reliable methods to hold an esophageal wireless monitoring system in position for 24 hours. Friction-assisted magnetic holding is proposed as an alternative to conventional holding techniques. Permanent magnet and electromagnet designs with the required characteristics to achieve this task were computer-designed and simulated. The size and power requirements of the magnets were considered. Simulation results were verified using laboratory experiments. Permanent neodymium magnets offered the best performance for the intended application. The obtained results show the feasibility of friction-assisted magnetic holding for esophageal monitoring. Improvements to the thread design, friction enhancing pins, magnetic shielding and encapsulation methods are necessary for in vivo testing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".