MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1507412565 · doi:10.1071/rdv17n2ab55

55 NUCLEUS CHANGES AND DEVELOPMENT OF PORCINE RECONSTRUCTED (NT) AND PARTHOGENETICALLY ACTIVATED (PA) EMBRYOS

2004· article· en· W1507412565 on OpenAlexfundno aff
N. R. Mtango, T. Kono

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAnimal Genetics and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs
KeywordsAndrologyChemistryCytochalasin BEmbryoMolecular biologyOocyteAnatomyIn vitroBiologyBiochemistryCell biologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nuclear reprogramming is characterized by functional modification(s) of the transferred nucleus that allows it to direct normal embryo development with the potential to grow to term. The aim of our study was to investigate the process of nuclear changes in reconstructed and activated embryos as well as their developmental competence. All chemicals used were from Sigma Chemicals (St. Louis, MO, USA). Cumulus-oocyte complexes were aspirated from slaughterhouse ovaries of prepurbetal gilts and matured for 42 h in vitro. The cumulus cells were removed by adding in 1 mg mL -1 hyaluronidase in TLP-HEPES. For the NT experiment, oocytes with first polar body were cultured in 0.4 µg mL-1 demecolcine for 1 h. A protruding membrane was removed by micromanipulator and a single donor nucleus from fetal fibroblast was injected subzonally. Fusion was conducted immediately after transfer in 0.3 M mannitol, 0.5 mM HEPES, 0.1% PVA, and 0.1 mM MgCl2 in a fusion chamber with parallel electrodes set 1 mm apart using a singe DC pulse of 125 V mm-1 for 80 s. Activation was done 2–4 h after fusion in the same medium as fusion but with 0.1 mM CaCl2 added; embryos were cultured in 5 µg mL-1 cytochalasin B and 10 µg mL-1 cyclohexamide for 6 h. The embryos were cultured in glucose-free NCSU-37 containing 4 mg mL-1 BSA as basic medium supplemented with 0.17 mM sodium pyruvate and 2.73 mM sodium lactate from Days 0 to 2, and then in basic medium with 5.55 mM D-glucose from Days 2–6 (Kikuchi K et al. 2002 Biol. Reprod. 66, 1033–1041). Non-manipulated oocytes (PA) were electrically activated as stated above. For observing the changes of donor cells, some reconstructed oocytes were fixed 2 h after fusion, prior to activation, and some 12 h after activation in acetic acid:ethanol (1:3) and stained in 1% orcein. The activated oocytes were fixed at 12 h and stained as stated above. There were 47.5% (38/80) of reconstructed oocytes with premature chromosome condensation (PCC), and 23.7% (19/80) with nuclear swelling two hours after fusion. Pronuclear like formation 12 h after activation was 45% (27/60) and 83.3% (50/60) in NT and PA, respectively. The blastocyst rate was 8.3% (5/60) and 46% (69/150) for NT and PA, respectively. The results suggest that porcine oocyte cytoplasm can successfully reprogram somatic cell nuclei and support the development of NT embryos to the blastocyst stage.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.259
Threshold uncertainty score0.691

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicAnimal Genetics and ReproductionFrench-language works237,207