MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1507445946 · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511486920.010

‘Canadian Dainty’: the rise and decline of Briticisms in Canada

2005· book-chapter· en· W1507445946 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
J. K. Chambers

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2005
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLinguistic Variation and Morphology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMainlandSettlement (finance)ColonialismHistoryGeographyEthnologyGenealogyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canadian English is one of the oldest transported varieties of English. Newfoundland, Canada's tenth province, is perhaps the oldest English-speaking colony in the New World, having been claimed by England in 1497, but Newfoundland English must be treated separately from other varieties of Canadian English because Newfoundland had a different settlement pattern and a long autonomous colonial history before becoming a province of Canada in 1949. (See Clarke, this volume.) In this chapter, I deal with mainland Canadian English, that is, with varieties spoken everywhere but Newfoundland. Mainland Canadian English is also venerable. English-speaking settlers began arriving in the part of the world that would become mainland Canada in 1713 when the French were forced to cede their colonies on the Atlantic seaboard to Britain, under the terms of the Treaty of Utrecht which ended Queen Anne's War. Those colonies, called Acadie by the French, became charter members of the Canadian Confederation 156 years later as the provinces of Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island. In 1763, fifty years after English-speaking settlers began arriving in Acadia, the French lost another war to England and were forced to cede their inland colony on the St Lawrence River, called Nouvelle France , in the Treaty of Paris. At that point, all of mainland Canada came open to English-speaking colonists. England was a much more avid empire-builder than France had been (Chambers and Heisler 1999) and settlers began arriving in fair numbers soon after.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.111
Threshold uncertainty score0.808

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.006
Science and technology studies0.0170.008
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicLinguistic Variation and MorphologyFrench-language works237,207