MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1507490827

Screech suppression of supersonic jet noise

2009· article· en· W1507490827 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Ramani Ramakrishnan, Sergio Raimondo, Anant Grewal, Gary Elfstrom

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian acoustics · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupersonic speedJet (fluid)Noise (video)Jet noiseNozzleTone (literature)AcousticsChevron (anatomy)AeroacousticsPhysicsEngineeringAerospace engineeringGeologyMechanicsSound pressureComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Screech tones are a common by-product of supersonic jets.The screech tones are seen to get amplified due to the effect of solid surfaces.The amplification is clearly seen in V/STOL aircrafts and in particular during landing.Different techniques have been applied to reduce and/or eliminate the screech tones altogether.A detailed test programme was conducted to evaluate the noise generating potential of supersonic jets.Screech tone removal was one subset of the test programme conducted at the at the National Research Council Canada's Acoustic Reverberant Chamber in Ottawa.The results of the measurement programme are presented in this paper.In particular, the results of two techniques utilized for screech removal will be the focus of the presentation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian acousticsSame topicAerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet FlowsFrench-language works237,207