MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1507718888 · doi:10.26522/br.v10i2.49

Just Playing Mad: Irrationalism in Automatism via Claude Gauvreau

2009· article· en· W1507718888 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Gregory Betts

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Brock Review · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhilosophical and Theoretical Analysis
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutomatism (medicine)Irrational numberDreamRepresentation (politics)AestheticsPsychoanalysisArtPsychologySociologyArt historyLawPolitical sciencePsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With particular attention paid to three plays by Claude Gauvreau, my study will address the aesthetics of madness as it arose in one substantial node of Canadian avant-gardism – the French-Canadian Automatist movement. The Automatists shared the European Surrealist’s strong spirit of unbridled, irrational psychological utopianism, but believed they had surpassed the Surrealists in rejecting representationalism in art (including dream representation). This paper demonstrates how and why the work of one Automatist artist struggled to enact and unleash an irrational art on an unsuspecting Québécois public.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.957
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Brock ReviewSame topicPhilosophical and Theoretical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207