Femmes et libre-échange en Amérique latine : le cas du Réseau latino-américain des femmes transformant l’économie
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le Réseau latino-américain des femmes transformant l’économie (REMTE, acronyme espagnol) a contribué à rapprocher les questions d’économie et de genre, en incitant les organisations à regarder le libre-échange comme une problématique genrée et en apportant une perspective féministe aux mouvements critiques du libre-échange. Les critiques féministes des théories dominantes sur les mouvements sociaux transnationaux considèrent que : 1) les études transnationales sont biaisées par une vision masculine des mouvements et des stratégies ; 2) l’objet d’analyse porte principalement sur l’État et le court terme ; 3) il est nécessaire d’aborder les dynamiques de genre au sein des mouvements sociaux. Dans cet article, l’auteur montre que la prise en compte de ces critiques nous permet de mieux comprendre le cas du REMTE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".