De la formulation de cas à la prévention de rechute : une thérapie cognitive systématique de la schizophrénie
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article discute du statut actuel de la recherche sur la thérapie cognitive (TC) de la schizophrénie. Après avoir passé en revue l'étendue des recherches indiquant l'efficacité de la thérapie cognitive pour ce trouble, on présente le processus thérapeutique typique. Les techniques clés en thérapie cognitive de la schizophrénie sont décrites de même que des exemples typiques de cas et des mises en garde contre des blocages éventuels en thérapie. Les techniques clés ici décrites sont l'engagement dans la relation thérapeutique, le développement d'explications, l'introduction du doute, le questionnement périphérique, les devoirs d'expérimentation comportementale, les approches axées sur les schémas, et la prévention de la rechute. La TC de la schizophrénie est considérée comme acceptable, efficace et solide en complémentarité avec les neuroleptiques et d'autres interventions de nature psychosociale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".