MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1507954096 · doi:10.1109/jestpe.2015.2433918

Bipolar Ripple Cancellation Method to Achieve Single-Stage Electrolytic-Capacitor-Less High-Power LED Driver

2015· article· en· W1507954096 on OpenAlexafffund
Yajie Qiu, Laili Wang, Hongliang Wang, Y.-F. Liu, Paresh C. Sen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced DC-DC Converters
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersQueen's University
KeywordsElectrolytic capacitorCapacitorRippleFilm capacitorFilter capacitorElectrical engineeringCapacitancePower factorVoltageElectronic engineeringMaterials scienceEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Conventional topologies for high-power LED drivers with high power factors (PFs) require large capacitances to limit the low frequency (100 or 120 Hz) LED current ripples. Electrolytic capacitors are commonly used because they are the only capacitors with sufficient energy density to accommodate high-power applications. However, the short life span of electrolytic capacitors significantly reduces the life span of the entire LED lighting fixture, which is undesirable. This paper proposes a bipolar (ac) ripple cancellation method with two different full-bridge power structures to cancel the low-frequency ac ripple in the LED current and minimize the output capacitance requirement, enabling the use of long-life film capacitors. Compared with the existing technologies, the proposed circuit achieves zero double-line-frequency current ripple through LED lamps and achieves a high PF and high efficiency. A 100-W (150 V/0.7 A) LED driver prototype was built which demonstrates that the proposed method can achieve the same double-line-frequency LED current ripple with only 44-μF film capacitors, compared with the 4700-μF electrolytic capacitors required in the conventional single-stage LED drivers. Meanwhile, the proposed prototype has achieved a peak power efficiency of 92.5%, benefiting from active clamp technology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations118
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power ElectronicsSame topicAdvanced DC-DC ConvertersFrench-language works237,207