MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1507965807 · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010437

Activity restriction for short-term and medium-term outcomes following mild traumatic brain injury

2013· reference-entry· en· W1507965807 on OpenAlexaff
Jocelyn Gravel, Antonio D’Angelo, Benoit Carrière, Louis Crevier, Miriam H. Beauchamp, Jean‐Marc Chauny, Maggy Wassef, Nils Chaillet

Bibliographic record

VenueCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2013
Typereference-entry
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerm (time)Traumatic brain injuryMedium termMedicinePsychologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPsychiatryPhysicsEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reason for Withdrawal The authors do not intend to complete the review, and have asked for it to be marked as inactive on the Cochrane Library. Following publication of the protocol, a search for studies was conducted and one study was identified as relevant to the review. The de Kruijk 2002 study involved 107 head injured participants. de Kruijk JR, Leffers P, Meerhoff S, Rutten J, Twijnstra A: Effectiveness of bed rest after mild traumatic brain injury: a randomised trial of no versus six days of bed rest. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002, 73:167–172. To view the published versions of this article, please click the 'Other versions' tab.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.062
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.062
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.008
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.277
GPT teacher head0.448
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsSame topicTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchFrench-language works237,207