MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1507973260 · doi:10.1109/mwscas.2003.1562504

Automated network synthesis utilizing MAPLE

2006· article· en· W1507973260 on OpenAlexaff
Samar Mohamed, M. Salama, R.R. Mansour

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Noise Suppression
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrequency domainComputer scienceMapleEquivalent circuitFilter (signal processing)Network synthesis filtersFrequency responseMicrowaveNetwork analysisSet (abstract data type)Band-pass filterTime domainDomain (mathematical analysis)Electronic engineeringMathematicsEngineeringTelecommunicationsElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In microwave electromagnetic EM analysis, only a small part of the network needs to be modeled in details. The remaining part of the network can be reduced to an equivalent model. Two different approaches were commonly utilized to generate this model, namely, the time-domain and frequency-domain. The time-domain methods represent the system by a set of differential equations that are integrated to represent the system response. This method is accurate but at the expense of being computationally demanding. The frequency dependant network equivalent can be obtained either directly by direct methods or iteratively by using optimization techniques. This paper utilizes the frequency-domain approach to determine the most possible accurate equivalent configuration for the desired microwave filter. Moreover, the paper presents an automated procedure utilizing MAPLE to the generation of the circuit parameters that is capable on synthesizing low-pass, high-pass as well as band-pass filters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.610
Threshold uncertainty score0.864

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectromagnetic Compatibility and Noise SuppressionFrench-language works237,207