Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Software Productivity Center Inc. (SPC) was formed in 1992 as a nonprofit organization promoting the use of best practices and processes to increase the efficiency, reliability, and predictability of the software development process. The SPC is located in Vancouver, BC, Canada. Its clients are situated around the world with the majority in the United States. The goal outlined in the original business plan was for the center to become self‐sustaining in five years. It reached this and privatized in 1997. SPC has a few attributes that set it apart from other leading centers for software process. SPC has a business perspective. SPC advocates best practices that will have the greatest initial impact on the success of the business, while helping to put a structure in place to ensure ongoing learning and advancement of the organization and its staff. SPC has over 100 member companies that enjoy benefits such as discounts on training and products, free monthly seminars, and advice and information from SPC experts. Interaction with these member companies ensures SPC stays current with the challenges and issues facing software organizations each day. Member companies also benefit from SPC's affiliation and participation in international organizations such as the International Organization for Standardization (ISO standards), The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE), and the Project Management Institute (PMI).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it