MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1508101397 · doi:10.1186/1742-4690-2-s1-s130

HIV/AIDS Treatment in Developing Countries: Guyana's Approach

2005· article· en· W1508101397 on OpenAlexaff
Leslie Ramsammy

Bibliographic record

VenueRetrovirology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
Canadian institutionsMinistry of HealthHealth Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Developing countryVirologyEnvironmental healthImmunologyEconomic growth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diagnostic and treatment tools for HIV are well known and are widely available today. Equitable accessibility to these tools is a major area of concern. The WHO estimates that about 7 M persons are in need of ARV therapy in low and middle-income countries around the world. The WHO × 5 initiative, launched in 2003, intended to have brought ARV treatment to at least 3 M persons by the end of 2005. By June 2005, only about 970,000 persons in low and middle-income countries were receiving ARV treatment. Latin America and the Caribbean lead the way with about 62% of those I need receiving ARV treatment. North Africa and the Middle East (5%) and Sub-Sahara Africa (11%) showed the lowest accessibility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.859
Threshold uncertainty score0.728

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRetrovirologySame topicHIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsFrench-language works237,207