MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1508195821 · doi:10.4000/economierurale.4002

Pertinence d’une double labellisation biologique-écologique auprès des consommateurs. Une application au cas des œufs

2013· article· fr· W1508195821 on OpenAlexaff
Sihem Dekhili, Mohamed Akli Achabou

Bibliographic record

VenueÉconomie rurale · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicOrganic Food and Agriculture
Canadian institutionsRéseau Technoscience
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesMathematicsCombinatoricsPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En France, comme dans la plupart des pays européens, les produits agroalimentaires ont été exclus du processus d’écolabellisation. Le label AB reste la référence pour la valorisation de ces produits. Nous nous sommes proposés dans cette recherche de déterminer dans quelle mesure le label écologique, ajouté au label biologique, pourrait valoriser les produits agro-alimentaires. Une étude empirique portant sur le cas des œufs, a été menée auprès de 85 consommateurs français. Les résultats d’une analyse conjointe montrent que l’utilisation combinée des deux labels influence positivement la préférence des consommateurs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.599
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉconomie ruraleSame topicOrganic Food and AgricultureFrench-language works237,207