MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1508284294

Hexactinellid Sponge Reefs on the Canadian Continental Shelf: A Unique "Living Fossil"

2001· article· en· W1508284294 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Kim W. Conway, Manfred Krautter, J V Barrie, Matthias Neuweiler

Bibliographic record

VenueGeoscience Canada · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCrustacean biology and ecology
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsReefGeologyContinental shelfPaleontologySeafloor spreadingTrawlingCoral reefOceanographyFisheryFish <Actinopterygii>Biology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Globally unique hexactinellid (siliceous) sponge reefs, found in deep (200 m), glacially scoured troughs of the western Canadian continental shelf, have been explored by a manned submersible. Submersible observations and geophysical data allow examination of the physical and biological processes that have shaped the sponge reefs, which began to form about 9 thousand years (k.y.) ago. The mounds (bioherms) and sheet-like accumulations (biostromes) cover a low-angle, non-depositional, iceberg-scoured seafloor, relict since the deglaciation of the region. Biohermal structures are up to 19 m in height, and are covered with hexactinosan sponges up to 1.5 m tall, creating abenthic habitat that discontinously covers roughly 700 km 2 . Similar to extinct siliceous sponge reefs, mud mounds, and reef mounds that were widespread during the Mesozoic, the modern reefs are like aliving fossil and provide a unique modern analogue. Fishing activities, especially trawling or bottom dragging, have damaged the slow-growing reefs insome areas. Resume Uniques au monde, les recifs d'eponges d'hexactinellides (siliceux) qui se trouvent a 200 m de profondeur dans des fosses d'abrasion glaciaires du plateau continental de l'Ouest du Canada, ont ete explores a partir de sous-marins habites. Les observations sous-marines et les donnees de geophysique permettent d'etudier les mecanismes physiques et biologiques qui ont preside a l'edification des recifs d'eponges qui ont commence a se former aux environs de 9 ka  P. Ces edifices recifaux en amas (biohermes), et en couches (biostromes) recouvrent un fond marin legerement incline par l'abrasion d'icebergs post-glaciaires. Ces biohermes ont jusqu'a 19 m de hauteur et sont recouverts d'une couche de 1,5 m de hauteur d'eponges hexactinellidiennes, forment un habitat couvrant de maniere discontinue une surface de 700 km 2 . Semblables a ces recifs d'eponges tres repandus au Mesozoiques, amas boueux et amas recifaux, les recifs modernes sont de veritables fossiles vivants, et sont a ce titre forts utiles pour la comprehension de leurs contreparties fossiles. Par endroits, les activites de peche industrielle, particulierement le chalutage ou le dragage de fond ont endommage ces edifices recifales a croissantes lentes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.039
Threshold uncertainty score0.078

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations88
Published2001
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeoscience CanadaSame topicCrustacean biology and ecologyFrench-language works237,207