MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1508403899 · doi:10.7202/044940ar

Références classiques implicites et explicites dans les écrits des Jésuites surla Nouvelle-France 1

2010· article· fr· W1508403899 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Haijo Jan Westra

Bibliographic record

VenueTangence · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article s’intéresse à la pratique de la citation implicite des sourcesclassiques dans les écrits latins des Jésuites sur le Canada, que l’on compare aveccelle de la citation explicite, en usage chez les mêmes auteurs dans les Relations qui, elles, sont écrites en languevernaculaire. L’analyse d’un poème latin figurant en tête du Journal des Jésuites permettra d’illustrer lepropos, en montrant en quoi l’inspiration virgilienne dont il procède met enparallèle la situation désastreuse de la mission jésuite en Nouvelle-France vers1650 avec celle des Troyens exilés dans l’ Énéide de Virgile. Ce poème, dont la signification n’a pas étéreconnue jusqu’à ce jour, témoigne d’une sensibilité se démarquant tout-à-fait decelle qui s’exprime dans les Relations .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.923
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.008
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTangenceSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207