Bibliographic record
Abstract
We use a dynamical systems approach based on the method of orthonormal frames to study the dynamics of a nontilted Bianchi type IX cosmological model with a bulk and shear viscous fluid source. We begin by completing a detailed fixed-point analysis which give the local sinks, sources and saddles of the dynamical system. We then analyze the global dynamics by finding the $\ensuremath{\alpha}$-and $\ensuremath{\omega}$-limit sets which give an idea of the past and future asymptotic behavior of the system. The fixed points were found to be a flat Friedmann-LeMai\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}tre-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) solution, Bianchi type II solution, Kasner circle, Jacobs disc, Bianchi type $\mathrm{V}\mathrm{I}{\mathrm{I}}_{0}$ solutions, and several closed FLRW solutions in addition to the Einstein static universe solution. Each equilibrium point was described in both its expanding and contracting epochs. We conclude the paper with some numerical experiments that shed light on the global dynamics of the system along with its heteroclinic orbits. With respect to past asymptotic states, we were able to conclude that the Jacobs disc in the expanding epoch was a source of the system along with the flat FLRW solution in a contracting epoch. With respect to future asymptotic states, we were able to show that the flat FLRW solution in an expanding epoch along with the Jacobs disc in the contracting epoch were sinks of the system. We were also able to demonstrate a new result with respect to the Einstein static universe. Namely, we gave certain conditions on the parameter space such that the Einstein static universe has an associated stable subspace. We were, however, not able to conclusively say anything about whether a closed FLRW model could be a past or future asymptotic state of the model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".