MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1508664794 · doi:10.1109/isemc.1991.148261

Groundbounce in ASIC's: model and test results

2002· article· en· W1508664794 on OpenAlexaff
L. Diaz-Olavarrieta

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLow-power high-performance VLSI design
Canadian institutionsBell (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApplication-specific integrated circuitInductanceNoise (video)ChipComputer scienceSeriousnessIntegrated circuitAmplitudeElectronic engineeringVoltageElectrical engineeringEngineeringEmbedded systemPhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Groundbounce is the noise produced by simultaneous switching of drivers in an ASIC, due to excessive current drawn from the power supply at the time of switching. This noise may cause delay and false triggering problems at the functional level, as well as emissions problems due to the fast rise time and amplitude of current spikes induced. Test results which attest to the seriousness of the groundbounce problem in large ASICs are presented. The importance of the positioning of switching drivers as a factor in reducing groundbounce is discussed. The model of groundbounce is detailed to include layout and package parameters, in order to more accurately calculate the effective inductance value to be used for predictions. The results presented correspond to groundbounce voltages measured in one test chip mounted on a PGA package.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.175
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLow-power high-performance VLSI designFrench-language works237,207