Things Which Aren't To Be Given Names: Afro-Caribbean and Diasporic Negotiations of Same Gender Desire and Sexual Relations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
occidentale de lbrientation sexuelk parce qu'elle est ineficace pour comprendre fa qu2te d'identitt homosexuelle chez les fernmes des Caraibes et de la diaspora. Elles ont crtt une idenn'tt ( ( queer r hybride qui est inspirte pprincipalement par les mythes, la mtmoire et la nostalgic de la diaspora. In July 2003, awell-known Toronto gay weekly,fab Magazine, published its "Pride Postmortem, " featuring articles on the year's Gay Pride pa-rade. In a section featuring witty "ex-pert " gay opinion about fashion and the festivities, a picture, featuring a Parade participant from the Carib-bean Queer Mas Band group "Pelaun2 was featured with the subheading: "Wrong day. Wrong parade... Caribana stray. " The same image in-cluded the text, "Is this a voodoo or voo-don't? " (Kirstein, Gidilevich, Rotman and Peterson 21). The im-ages and commentary became the centre of a large letter writing cam-paign, where community members, community organizations and of-col-our youth wrote in their disagree-ment. How, they asked, could we develop a community that was "Di-verse, Defiant and Divine " with such racism and bigotry? (Chudnovsky 12) The Pride Postmortem contro-versy is one example ofwhat can be called diasporic negotiations of a gay dystopia, where diasporically-situated people find themselves both inside and outside a western-centric recognizably "gay " identity. Afro-Caribbean people's same gen-der desire, identity, and commu-nity building in the Caribbean diaspora ' involves a continuous ne-gotiation of a dystopia of racism and sexism in the Canadian con-text where acceptance of gay iden-tity in all its diversity is unfortu-nately not the norm. For this paper, I am specifically speaking of the Caribbean diaspora located in Canada and the U.S. (and to a lesser extent, the UK) but which speaks more specifically to the ex-perience ofAfro migrants from the Caribbean, who share a specific experience of colonialism and forced displacement, as well as newer migrations to North America in the era of globalization (see
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.063 | 0.029 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".