MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1509106489 · doi:10.1109/ner.2015.7146693

High compression rate and efficient spikes detection system using compressed sensing technique for neural signal processing

2015· article· en· W1509106489 on OpenAlexafffund
Nan Li, Mohamad Sawan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeuroscience and Neural Engineering
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilCanada Research ChairsCMC Microsystems
KeywordsComputer scienceCompressed sensingSignal compressionData compressionEuclidean distanceSIGNAL (programming language)Artificial neural networkCompression ratioCompression (physics)Signal processingMatrix (chemical analysis)Data compression ratioArtificial intelligenceAlgorithmPattern recognition (psychology)Digital signal processingImage compressionEngineeringImage processingComputer hardwareMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We design a digital neural signal compression and spikes detection system using compressed sensing technique and root-mean-square method respectively. This system does not only detect spikes from a neural signal but also can compress this neural signal with a high compression rate. In the compression part, due to the fact that neural signals are not sparse in the time domain, we designed a sensing matrix, called Minimum Euclidean or Manhattan Distance Cluster-based (MDC) matrix, to compress neural signals. Using this MDC matrix and a novel reconstruction algorithm, we achieve a compression rate which can be up to 90% with the reconstruction error being around 0.2. Moreover, the proposed system has relatively low power consumption (0.59 mW) and a small chip area (7 μm <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</sup> ).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.399
Threshold uncertainty score0.647

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNeuroscience and Neural EngineeringFrench-language works237,207