MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1509129244

O2+ Recombination abundances in planetary nebulae

2001· article· es· W1509129244 on OpenAlexaff
R. L. Kingsburgh, M. H. Armour

Bibliographic record

VenueRedalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) · 2001
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsPlanetary nebulaRecombinationAstrophysicsLine (geometry)Excited stateSpectroscopyAstronomyAtomic physicsStarsBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

"We present O2+/H+ abundances derived from echelle spectroscopy of fourplanetary nebulae, NGC 6210, NGC 6826, Hu2{1, NGC 6543, from the forbidden,collisionally excited lines, and from the permitted recombination lines. We ndthat the ratio of the recombination line to collisional line abundances ranges fromessentially unity (1.2 for Hu 2{1) to 6.6, for an o?set position of NGC 6826, andcorresponding t2 values range from 0.016 to 0.087."

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRedalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México)→Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies→French-language works237,207→