Los usos de los otros como categoría emergente en el proceso de apropiación de Internet
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumen: Este articulo presenta los resultados de un estudio sobre la apropiacion de Internet en los centros de acceso comunitario a Internet (telecentros) en Chile. Considerado como un fenomeno complejo, el proceso de apropiacion que vive una persona de una tecnologia pasa por diferentes momentos, que va desde el acceso hasta la natural incorporacion de esta es su vida cotidiana. Nosotros nos detenemos en el momento de la significacion del uso de la tecnologia, considerado como el meollo de dicho proceso. Esta significacion muestra la comprension que el individuo le da al uso, la que se forma, entre otras cosas, gracias a la influencia que tiene la comunidad en la cual vive, pero ademas, a la evaluacion que los mismos usuarios hacen del ‘uso de los otros’. Este articulo se concentra en este ultimo punto, que es presentado como una categoria de analisis emergente del analisis de la apropiacion de Internet. Palabras clave: Usos; Apropiacion; Internet; telecentros. Resumo: Este artigo apresenta os resultados de um estudo sobre a apropriacao da Internet nos centros de acesso comunitario a esta tecnologia (telecentros) no Chile. Considerado um fenomeno complexo, o procresso de apropriacao de uma tecnologia vivido por uma pessoa passa por diferentes momentos, do acesso ate a incorporacao natural em sua vida cotidiana. Nos nos concentramos no momento da significacao do uso da tecnologia, considerado o centro deste processo. Esta significacao mostra a compreensao que o individuo da ao uso, a qual se forma, entre outras coisas, gracas a influencia exercida pela propria comunidade na qual ele vive, mas, alem disso, a avaliacao que os mesmos usuarios fazem do “uso dos outros”. Este artigo se concentra neste ultimo ponto, que e apresentado como uma categoria de analise emergente da apropriacao da Internet. Palavras-chave: Usos; Apropriacao; Internet; Telecentros. Abstract: This article shows the results of a study about Internet appropriation in Internet Community Access Centers (telecenters) in Chile. Being considered as a complex phenomenon, the appropriation processof a technology has different moments, from the first access to natural integration in his/her life. Weinvestigate carefully the signification of the use considered as the most important point of this process.This signification shows the construction of meanings that people give to the use of this technology.This construction is influenced by people of his/her community, and also by the evaluation that these users make of the “uses of others”. This article focuses on this last point, considered as an emergent category in the study of appropriation. Keywords: Uses; Apropriation; Internet; telecenters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".