MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1509236966

Building a Learning Object Content Management System

2005· article· en· W1509236966 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOpen Education and E-Learning
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuiteComputer scienceLearning objectSoftware engineeringLearning ManagementObject (grammar)World Wide WebContent managementContent management systemMultimediaEngineering managementEngineeringArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While the e ducational te chnology community is rife with le arning obje ct-base d spe cifications, tools for supporting the se spe cific ations (both at an authoring and at a de live ry le ve l) are patchy at be st. This pape r outline s oure xpe ri e nce s ove r the last two ye ars in building a suite o f tools to de ploy an online course base d primarily on IMS spe cifications. The se tools include a le arning obje ct se que ncinge nvironme nt, a conte nt d e live rye ngine , and an asse ssme nt application. Finally, this pape r outline s are as whe re spe cificat ion and tool support could use improve me nt, base d on re se arch conducte d from me mbe rs of our lab ove r the last de cade or so.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.909
Threshold uncertainty score0.922

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOpen Education and E-LearningFrench-language works237,207