MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1509333755 · doi:10.4000/cybergeo.989

Béatrice COLLIGNON,Les Inuit : ce qu´ils savent du territoire, Paris, L´Harmattan, 1996, 254 pages

2011· article· fr· W1509333755 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bernard Debarbieux

Bibliographic record

VenueCybergeo · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyEleganceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Même si une telle entrée en matière peut sembler un peu désuète, il n´est pas injustifié de signaler en tout premier lieu que cet ouvrage est d´une rare élégance. Le charme tient évidemment au territoire étudié. Comme tant de prédécesseurs prestigieux, de Franz Boas à Jean Malaurie, en passant par Marcel Mauss, Béatrice Collignon a choisi l´Arctique pour conduire ses recherches. Et tous ces travaux doivent peut-être une partie de leur force à la capacité de cet environnement et des sociétés q...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.905
Threshold uncertainty score0.189

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.009
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0040.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCybergeoSame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207