MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1509336789 · doi:10.7202/1024081ar

L’hôpital comme espace de circulation d’une norme globalisée

2014· article· fr· W1509336789 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ève Bureau-Point

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthropologie et Sociétés · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Identity, and Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceESPACESociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article décrit comment une norme, la participation des personnes séropositives dans le système de santé, pensée et promue à l’échelle internationale par les organismes de lutte contre le sida, est interprétée dans le contexte hospitalier du Cambodge. Issue d’une étude ethnographique réalisée dans quatre hôpitaux cambodgiens (à Phnom Penh, Battambang, Siem Reap et Kandal) entre 2006 et 2008, cette analyse met en évidence la pluralité des sens que peut revêtir une même norme, la marge de manoeuvre des acteurs locaux par rapport à celle-ci et l’influence du contexte social sur les mécanismes d’interprétation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.015
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0150.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0050.027
Scholarly communication0.0110.008
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.210
GPT teacher head0.551
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnthropologie et SociétésSame topicMigration, Identity, and HealthFrench-language works237,207