Betaine Adducts of N‐Heterocyclic Carbenes: Synthesis, Properties, and Reactivity / Synthesis and Study of 5,5′‐Bibenzimidazolylidenes and Their Bimetallic Complexes / Synthesis and in vitro Efficacy Studies of Silver Carbene Complexes on Biosafety Level 3 Bacteria / Structure and Reactivity of Dinitrogen Rhodium Complexes Containing N‐Heterocyclic Carbene Ligands / Samb<i>V</i>ca: A Web Application for the Calculation of the Buried Volume of N‐Heterocyclic Carbene Ligands — (Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 13/2009)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The cover picture is a composite design depicting the variety in NHC complex chemistry. Like pieces in a puzzle, all details contribute to our growing knowledge of these compounds. The first puzzle piece in the bottom left corner represents the carbene precursors, essential in all synthesis design (C. W. Bielawski et al.; p. 1729 ff). The background reflects the importance of these complexes, here in the homogeneous catalytic chemistry of gaseous molecules (C. M. Crudden et al.; p. 1746 ff), while the diverse structural types are highlighted by the zwitterionic “crabenes” mid right (L. Delaude; p. 1681 ff). Related aspects such as the physical chemistry or biological relevance are not forgotten: the sketch of the buried volume of an NHC ligand symbolizes the former (L. Cavallo et al.; p. 1759 ff), and the antimicrobial activity of silver–NHC complexes against biosafety level 3 bacteria typifies the latter (W. J. Youngs et al.; p. 1739 ff). Mr. François Nicks is acknowledged for drawing the “crabene”. The editorial office thanks all authors for their excellent contributions to this cover picture puzzle. Finally, there are many gaps. EurJIC hopes that this issue will stimulate you to discover another fragment that will complete the picture.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".