ELECTROCHEMICAL POLARIZATION BEHAVIOUR OF Mg-Al ALLOYS IN NEAR-NEUTRAL SOLUTIONS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A study has been conducted in mildly aggressive saline solutions to indentify subtle yet important difference in the anodic and cathodic process of three Mg-Al alloys, AZ31B, AM30 and AM60B in a partially passive state and a localized corrosion state. The influence of metallurgical factors and environment variables on the corrosion resistance and surface film breakdown process has been investigated using potentiodynamic and potentiostatic tests combined with optical microscopy. All three Mg-Al alloys corroded in a partially protected state under open circuit conditions in the test solution and the surface film formed on each exhibited a similar breakdown potential. This indicates that metallurgical factors such as alloying additions and the presence of the β-phase (Mg17Al12) did not significantly influence the surface film breakdown process. AM60B exhibited improved corrosion resistance at potentials below the breakdown potential due to the formation of a more protective surface film. The β- phase, however, did not strongly influence either the anodic process at potentials above the breakdown potential or the cathodic process. It was determined that increasing the alloy Al content increases the corrosion potential of Mg-Al alloys, but also increases the risk of localized corrosion. The similar anodic and cathodic polarization behaviour exhibited by AZ31B and AM30 indicates that a 1 wt % Zn alloying addition does not strongly influence the corrosion resistance of these alloys. The die-cast skin of AM60B exhibited better corrosion resistance than the interior at potentials below the breakdown potential due to the higher fraction of Al-rich β-phase, which improved the protective ability of the surface film. The semi-continuous β-phase network did not provide a strong micro-galvanic activity to drive anodic dissolution of the α-phase, therefore, did not significantly affect the corrosion resistance above the breakdown potential. The crystallographic texture exhibited by the extruded AM30 did not strongly affect the short-term and long-term corrosion resistance. AM30 showed a relatively steady passive state during long time exposures in a room temperature 0.01 M NaCl solution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".