MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1509709213

Effect of the class of switching-mode power amplifiers on the efficiency of band-pass delta-sigma architectures

2011· article· en· W1509709213 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Microwave Integrated Circuit Conference · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Power Amplifier Design
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDuty cycleAmplifierDelta-sigma modulationModulation (music)Band-pass filterTransmitterPower (physics)SigmaElectronic engineeringDelta modulationRF power amplifierSIGNAL (programming language)Control theory (sociology)PhysicsEngineeringComputer scienceElectrical engineeringVoltagePulse-amplitude modulationChannel (broadcasting)Acoustics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies the impact of using a non-50-% duty cycle square-wave as an input signal, on the efficiency performance of different types of switching-mode power amplifiers (SMPAs). This investigation is important when the power amplifier (PA) is fed with bi-level pulses with a duty cycle different from the typical value of 50 %. This is the case in bandpass delta-sigma (BPDS) modulation where the duty cycle of the output pulses may vary from 0 % to 100 % based on the type of modulation and signal statistics. Simulation results show that the class-E PA is less sensitive to the variation of the duty cycle than the class-F and the class-D modes of operation. Therefore class-E PA is the best choice to be employed in band-pass delta-sigma based transmitter designs. Besides the PAs performance comparison, a correction on the efficiency calculation of the SMPAs driven by a duty cycle varying signal, is proposed in this paper.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.287
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it