MOVILIDAD Y LUGARES TURÍSTICOS. ELEMENTOS DE REFLEXIÓN A PARTIR DEL ESPACIO CARIBEÑO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este articulo contribuye a analizar el sistema de movilidad a traves de enclaves estrategicos como son los lugares turisticos, espejos de la globalizacion. Los lugares turisticos no existen sino a traves de los flujos de personas: movimientos variados y complejos entre migraciones y turismo. En el contexto del control de las fronteras Norte-Sur, los lugares turisticos emergentes, situados en los margenes de las regiones mas ricas, representan quizas una oportunidad para bordear las fronteras regionales. A traves del analisis de la movilidad en el espacio caribeno, las viejas categorias utilizadas para describir los tipos de desplazamientos muestran sus limites de cara a la complejidad de los flujos y de las crecientes interacciones. Seguira un microanalisis a la escala de la isla de la Martinica que permite abrir una reflexion sobre los aspectos sociales de esta movilidad e interrogarse sobre las cuestiones en juego en torno a las fronteras, nuevas y antiguas, politicas y socioespaciales. This paper contributes to the analysis of the mobilities’ system throughout strategic sites which are the tourist places, a mirror of globalisation. The tourist places only exist through human flows: varied and complex flows between migrations and tourism. In the context of North-South borders’ control the emerging tourist places located at the margins of the richest regions sometimes represent an opportunity in order to bypass the regional borders. Across the analysis of mobilities in the Caribbean area, the old categories used in order to describe the type of movement show their limits in face of the complex flows of growing interactions. Therefore a microanalysis of the Martinique Island allows us to start pondering over the social aspects of the afore-mentioned mobilities and the stakes and interests as regard the old and new political and socio-spatial borders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".