MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W150999474

Modeling of biogas generation in bioreactor landfills using neuro-fuzzy system

2008· article· en· W150999474 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venueinternational conference on Modelling and simulation · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndustrial Automation and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdaptive neuro fuzzy inference systemBioreactorBiogasLeachateNeuro-fuzzyProcess engineeringFuzzy control systemFuzzy logicController (irrigation)Computer scienceEnvironmental scienceControl engineeringControl theory (sociology)EngineeringWaste managementArtificial intelligenceControl (management)Chemistry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biogas generation in anaerobic bioreactor landfills is modeled using the neuro-fuzzy system. The implemented inference system was an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS). The fuzzy logic controller featured a Multi-Input-Single-Output (MISO) structure in which time, leachate recirculation, and sludge addition were set as the controlled input variables. Biogas generation was the only manipulated output variable. The experimental data used in the study were obtained from earlier publications that involved lab scale anaerobic bioreactors operated under different rates of leachate recirculation and sludge addition. The selected data sets were employed in training, verifying, and validating the neuro-fuzzy inference system. The model simulated the actual experimental data quite successfully; however, some differences occurred in the validation process. The model achieved acceptable statistical measures which attested its potentials in predicting biogas generation in bioreactor landfills.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.247
Threshold uncertainty score0.384

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.143
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.132 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it