[Care of children and mothers: research on preventable deaths in children under five years].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the treatment of children and mothers in basic health units based on the investigation of deaths in children under five years. This is an evaluative study, that analyzed 41 deaths ocurred in 2008 in the city of Maringá, state of Paraná, Brasil. 90.2% of these deaths were preventable. 38.5% of the pregnant women had theirfirst prenatal consultation in the first quarter of pregnancy. 50.0% had more than six consultations. 73.1% were assessed for risk pregnancy. 34.6% of chart records had information on prenatal laboratory tests. 50.0% of births occurred by cesarean section. 87.5% of charts contained records of child growth monitoring and risk assessment of newborns. None had records of neuromotor development. 50.0% had complete vaccination records. 75.0% received home visits from a family healthcare team. All children at low risk had three visits to doctors. Only one high-risk newborn reached seven medical consultations. The conclusion is that there are failures in the professional records of prenatal care, as well as in the quality of monitoring of children considered at risk.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".