On the Communication Pathways between the Central Pacemaker and Peripheral Oscillators
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Circadian rhythms are regulated by clocks located in specific structures of the CNS, such as the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) in mammals, and by peripheral oscillators present in various other tissues. The expression of essential clock genes oscillates both in the SCN and in peripheral pacemakers. Peripheral tissues in the fly and in the fish are directly photoreceptive. In particular, we have established the Z3 embryonic zebrafish cell line that recapitulates the dynamic light-dependent regulation of the vertebrate clock in vitro. In mammals the synchronization to daily light cycles involves neural connections from a subset of light-sensitive receptor-containing retinal ganglion cells. Humoral and/or hormonal signals originating from the SCN are thought to provide timing cues to peripheral clocks. However, alternative routes exist, as some peripheral clocks in mammals can be specifically entrained in a SCN-independent manner by restricted feeding regimes. Thus, not all peripheral tissues are equal in circadian rhythmicity. Testis, for example, displays no intrinsic circadian rhythmicity and the molecular mechanisms of clock gene activation in male germ cells appear to differ from other tissues. The study of the connecting routes that link the SCN to peripheral tissues is likely to reveal signalling pathways of fundamental physiological significance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".