Taux d'emploi et participation a la vie active des Canadiennes vivant en milieu rural
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans le present article, un modele dynamique de l'emploi des femmes a ete estime a partir de l'echantillon rural et de l'echantillon urbain utilises durant les quatre premieres annees de l'Enquete sur la dynamique du travail et du revenu (1993 a 1996). Les resultats attestent qu'il existe des differences significatives entre les marches du travail rural et urbain. Cependant, contrairement a ce que l'on affirme souvent, ces ecarts ne semblent pas etre attribuables a un manque de garderies, a des differences relatives au rendement du capital humain ou encore a des attitudes plus a l'egard du role de la femme en milieu rural. Les resultats suggerent egalement une segmentation du marche du travail rural, des differences manifestes ayant ete observees relativement au taux d'emploi des femmes appartenant a un menage a faible revenu, comme en temoignent les resultats de la decomposition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".