MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1510611482 · doi:10.1002/9780470511619.ch13f

Part F: Directed Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells into Myeloid Cells

2007· other· en· W1510611482 on OpenAlexaff
Chantal Cerdan, Mickie Bhatia

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPluripotent Stem Cells Research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmbryoid bodyCell biologyEndodermEctodermMesodermEmbryonic stem cellBiologyHaematopoiesisStem cellBone marrowCellular differentiationImmunologyMolecular biologyChemistryAdult stem cellEmbryogenesisEmbryoGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The in vitro aggregation of human embryonic stem (ES) cells into three dimensional clusters, termed embryoid bodies (EB), allows for the spontaneous differentiation of cells representing endoderm, mesoderm and ectoderm lineages. During EB differentiation, the stochastic generation of hematopoietic cells is enhanced by a combination of hematopoietic cytokines and the mesoderm inducer bone morphogenetic protein-4 (BMP-4). Under this treatment, up to 90% of CD45+ cells with colony forming unit (CFU) activity can be generated. These cells solely derive from a rare subpopulation of hemogenic precursors that lack CD45, but express PECAM-1, Flk-1 and VE-Cadherin (CD45negPFV), and can repopulate the bone marrow of immune deficient mice after intra bone marrow injection, albeit at very low levels. This chapter describes protocols that have been successfully applied in our laboratory for the in vitro and in vivo generation and characterization of hematopoietic cells from EBs and purified CD45negPFV hemogenic precursors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPluripotent Stem Cells Research→French-language works237,207→