MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1510785768 · doi:10.3138/flor.25.011

Some Recent Books on Scottish Literature

2008· article· en· W1510785768 on OpenAlex
David Parkinson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueFlorilegium · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicScottish History and National Identity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScotsScope (computer science)CriticismAction (physics)HistoryLiteratureClassicsArtComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As one might expect from a literature in which flyting is prominent, criticism can be a vigorous exercise in medieval and early modern Scotland. More than one Scots poet ends a substantial work with a premonition of the carping it will arouse. Completing his Eneados, Gavin Douglas added a pre-emptive “Exclamatioun aganyst detractouris and oncurtas redaris that beyn our studyus, but occasioun, to note and spy owt faltis or offencis.” Proprietary readers like William Dunbar are always ready to be stung into vituperative action by rivals who “hes thame self aboif the sternis styld.” Given the Caledonian scope of the books about to be discussed, what follows may be taken in the spirit of such traditional exchanges: “Of this fabill, as myne author dois write, / I sall reheirs in rude and hamelie dite.”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.312
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it