Abstract P254: Impact of a 12-Weeks Supervised Physical Activity Program After Bariatric Surgery on Cardiorespiratory Capacity; A Randomized Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bariatric surgery is an effective long-term treatment for the management of severe obesity. Weight loss induced by bariatric surgery is characterized by a greater reduction in the fat mass than the reduction in muscle mass. Severely obese patients have a reduced exercise-capacity reduced and perform external work with higher energy expenditure. There is a lack of data regarding the effect of physical activity on cardiorespiratory capacity after bariatric surgery. The purpose of this study was to measure the impact of bariatric surgery and the impact of a supervised physical activity program, between months 3 to 6 after bariatric surgery, on cardiorespiratory capacity. Patients were randomized either to a supervised physical activity program group (exercise group) or usual care without personalized physical activity follow-up group (control group). Anthropometric measurements, abdominal and mid-thigh computed tomography scans, heart rate variability (HRV) measurement and maximal exercise test were performe...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".