MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1510991112 · doi:10.1109/glocom.1994.513565

Analysis and simulation of the buffered-expanded delta fast packet switch

2002· article· en· W1510991112 on OpenAlexafffund
R.Y. Awdeh, Hussein T. Mouftah

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInterconnection Networks and Systems
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersGovernment of CanadaAustralian Government
KeywordsInterleavingComputer scienceBurst switchingThroughputPacket switchingNetwork packetLAN switchingCrossover switchNode (physics)Cut-through switchingComputer networkFast packet switchingCircuit switchingTopology (electrical circuits)Value (mathematics)Real-time computingTransmission delayCrossbar switchProcessing delayPhysicsElectrical engineeringEngineeringOperating systemTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The expanded delta fast packet switch (EDFPS) was proposed for ATM switching. It is constructed by interleaving L delta networks, and it employs a combined external input-output buffering strategy. It was shown that the EDFPS achieves high performance using relatively small values of L. This paper describes an internally-buffered version of the EDFPS. The resulting switch preserves cell-sequencing and employs distributed control concepts. The performance of the switch is evaluated using both analysis and simulation. It is shown that by using internal node buffering, the value of L needed to achieve high performance is significantly reduced. In particular, an L of 4 combined with a single buffer at each switching element inlet results in above 95% maximum throughput for a very large-size switch. Finally, the buffered-EDFPS is examined against nonuniform traffic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.782
Threshold uncertainty score0.131

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInterconnection Networks and SystemsFrench-language works237,207