Abstract W MP37: Novel Prognostic Scores for Early Prediction of Outcome Following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a cerebrovascular emergency. Currently, clinicians have limited tools to estimate outcomes early after hospitalization. We aimed to develop novel prognostic scores using large cohorts of patients reflecting experience from different settings. Methods: Logistic regression analysis was used to develop prediction models for mortality and unfavorable outcomes according to 3-month Glasgow outcome score after SAH based on readily obtained parameters at hospital admission. The development cohort was derived from 10 prospective studies involving 10936 patients in the Subarachnoid Hemorrhage International Trialists (SAHIT) repository. Model performance was assessed by bootstrap internal validation and by cross validation by omission of each of the 10 studies, using R2 statistic, Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC), and calibration plots. Prognostic scores were developed from the regression coefficients. Results: Predictor variable with the strongest prognostic strength was neurologic status (partial R2 = 12.03%), followed by age (1.91%), treatment modality (1.25%), Fisher grade of CT clot burden (0.65%), history of hypertension (0.37%), aneurysm size (0.12%) and aneurysm location (0.06%). These predictors were combined to develop 3 sets of hierarchical scores based on the coefficients of the regression models. The AUC at bootstrap validation was 0.79-0.80, and at cross validation was 0.64-0.85. Calibration plots demonstrated satisfactory agreement between predicted and observed probabilities of the outcomes. Conclusions: The novel prognostic scores have good predictive ability and potential for broad application as they have been developed from prospective cohorts reflecting experience from different centers globally.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".