EL POSESIVO (ANTEPUESTO) T�NICO EN ESPA�OL: �FEN�MENO DE FOCO Y CONTRASTE?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En espanol septentrional peninsular los pronombres posesivos de un solo poseedor (mi, tu su) pueden presentar una variante tonica (mi, tu, su). Este empleo todavia no ha sido objeto de descripcion ni estudio. si en el discurso espontaneo estos posesivos antepuestos unas veces son atonos y otras tonicos, debe haber un factor estructural, informativo, detras de este empleo. Nos preguntamos, por ello, si es posible hacer uso de nociones como las de foco y contraste para caracterizar el constituyente posesivo en este fenomeno de microvariacion del espanol septentrional. Para ello, revisamos en primer lugar las descripciones precedentes sobre su distribucion geografica y establecemos un acercamiento a las nociones de topico, foco y contraste. Despues, realizamos una clasificacion y descripcion general del posesivo antepuesto tonico en espanol septentrional gracias a los datos del Corpus Oral y Sonoro del Espanol Rural (COSER). Por ultimo, estableceremos algunas consideraciones finales sobre el fenomeno.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it