MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1511447053 · doi:10.3917/trav.024.0073

Détruire les animaux inutiles à la production

2011· article· fr· W1511447053 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sébastien Mouret

Bibliographic record

VenueTravailler · 2011
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldNeuroscience
TopicPsychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceCouragePhilosophyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé À l’appui d’enquêtes de psychodynamique du travail réalisées en 2006 auprès de salariés en production porcine industrielle au Québec, cet article montre comment la destruction économique d’animaux est vécue comme un « sale boulot » qui va à l’encontre du sens moral que ceux-ci donnent à leur relation de travail aux animaux. Élever, c’est contribuer à la vie des animaux en essayant de les sauver de la maladie et de la mort. C’est aussi avoir le courage d’assumer la responsabilité morale de la mise à mort des bêtes atteintes d’un mal incurable, afin de leur éviter des souffrances inutiles. Pour endurer ce travail de mort, les salariés déploient des stratégies collectives de défense. Cependant, l’adoption de conduites fondées sur un courage viril stigmatise les difficultés de ceux et celles qui ne parviennent pas à détruire des animaux, tandis que ces conduites sont elles-mêmes fragilisées par un turn over important.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.271
Threshold uncertainty score0.539

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.235
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.051 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTravaillerSame topicPsychology of Moral and Emotional JudgmentFrench-language works237,207